Confidentiality
Doctor Responsibility
“patients have a right to expect that their personal information will be held in
confidence by their doctors” - GMC, 2017
In order to maintain trust in doctors by patients.
- As healthcare information is sensitive
- Patients are vulnerable in their time of need
Principalism
- Non-maleficence - Revealing information that could lead to negative implications
- Autonomy - requires security and self determination
- Beneficence - Rare that disclosure would ever benefit a patient, so maintain confidentiality
- Justice - Fairness lies in maintaining confidentiality, patient is revealing sensitive info for doctor to be able to treat them.
- Deontological pov: Duties of confidentiality in a given case, applies to all of the similar cases → Confidentiality should be upheld.
- Utilitarian pov: Confidentiality should be maintained in general, based on assessment and consequences of not doing so.
- Virtue Ethicist: A 'Good' Doctor would ideally maintain confidentiality
Law and Regulations
- No single law pertaining to confidentiality
- Consists of multiple cases
- Uk govt summary
- Hunter v Mann - All information gained by Dr is to be protected by confidentiality